If you track macros, you've probably eaten at both CAVA and Chipotle. The menus are similar in format (pick a base, pick a protein, load up toppings) but the actual numbers are pretty different once you look ingredient by ingredient.
This isn't a taste test or a "which is healthier" opinion piece. It's a side-by-side comparison using official published nutrition data from both restaurants. Same goals, different menus.
You can build and test any of these combinations yourself in our CAVA Macro Calculator or Chipotle Macro Calculator.
Proteins: Chipotle Wins on Efficiency
Protein is where the two menus split the most.
| Protein | Restaurant | Calories | Protein | Fat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken | Chipotle | 180 | 32g | 7g |
| Steak | Chipotle | 150 | 21g | 6g |
| Barbacoa | Chipotle | 170 | 24g | 7g |
| Grilled Steak | CAVA | 170 | 23g | 9g |
| Braised Lamb | CAVA | 210 | 24g | 12g |
| Grilled Chicken | CAVA | 250 | 28g | 13g |
| Harissa Honey Chicken | CAVA | 260 | 26g | 14g |
| Carnitas | Chipotle | 210 | 23g | 12g |
| Sofritas | Chipotle | 150 | 8g | 10g |
| Falafel | CAVA | 350 | 6g | 26g |
Chipotle's chicken is the standout. 32g of protein for 180 calories is hard to beat anywhere in fast casual. CAVA's chicken is 250 calories for 28g. That's 70 extra calories for 4 fewer grams of protein.
The steak comparison is closer. Chipotle steak is 150 calories for 21g. CAVA steak is 170 for 23g. Both are solid lean options.
At the bottom of both menus: Chipotle's sofritas (150 cal, 8g protein) and CAVA's falafel (350 cal, 6g protein) are both poor choices if protein is the goal.
If protein per calorie is your primary concern, Chipotle wins this category. For max protein builds including double chicken, see our highest protein Chipotle bowl guide.
Bases: CAVA Wins With Lentils
CAVA's base menu has one ingredient Chipotle can't touch.
| Base | Restaurant | Calories | Protein | Carbs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black Lentils | CAVA | 270 | 18g | 37g |
| Brown Rice | Chipotle | 210 | 4g | 36g |
| White Rice | Chipotle | 210 | 4g | 40g |
| Saffron Basmati Rice | CAVA | 290 | 5g | 54g |
| Brown Rice | CAVA | 310 | 7g | 48g |
| Black Beans | Chipotle | 130 | 8g | 22g |
| Pinto Beans | Chipotle | 130 | 8g | 21g |
CAVA's black lentils are 270 calories with 18g of protein. Chipotle's brown rice is 210 calories with 4g. That's a 14g protein difference from the base alone, before you've even picked a protein.
Chipotle's counter is beans. You can add black beans or pinto beans (130 cal, 8g protein each) on top of rice to stack fiber and protein. But that's two ingredients (rice + beans = 340 cal, 12g protein) doing what lentils do in one (270 cal, 18g protein).
If you're comparing rice to rice, Chipotle is cheaper calorie-wise. Both Chipotle rice options are 210 calories. CAVA's are 290 and 310. That's an 80 to 100 calorie gap just from the base.
CAVA wins if you use lentils. Chipotle wins on rice. If you're adding beans at Chipotle to close the fiber gap, lentils are still more efficient.
Dressings and Sauces: CAVA Has More Range
Chipotle's main "dressing" is the Chipotle-Honey Vinaigrette at 220 calories and 1g of protein. That's the only true dressing option. Beyond that you're looking at salsas (15 to 80 calories) and dairy toppings (110 to 230 calories).
CAVA has eight dressings ranging from 30 to 180 calories:
| Dressing | Restaurant | Calories |
|---|---|---|
| Yogurt Dill | CAVA | 30 |
| Balsamic Date Vinaigrette | CAVA | 60 |
| Lemon Herb Tahini | CAVA | 70 |
| Hot Harissa Vinaigrette | CAVA | 70 |
| Skhug | CAVA | 80 |
| Tahini Caesar | CAVA | 90 |
| Greek Vinaigrette | CAVA | 130 |
| Garlic Dressing | CAVA | 180 |
| Chipotle-Honey Vinaigrette | Chipotle | 220 |
CAVA's Yogurt Dill at 30 calories is lighter than anything Chipotle offers as a finishing sauce. Chipotle's salsas are 15 to 25 calories, but they serve a different purpose (flavor, not creaminess).
CAVA wins on dressing variety and low-calorie options. Chipotle's salsa game is stronger if you just want flavor for near-zero calories.
Calorie Traps at Each
Every build-your-own restaurant has ingredients that quietly wreck the calorie count. Here's what to watch at each.
At CAVA: Falafel (350 cal, 6g protein) is the worst offender. Garlic Dressing (180 cal, 0g protein) and Greek Vinaigrette (130 cal, 0g protein) are the dressing traps. Avocado (110 cal, 1g protein) and pita crisps (70 cal, 1g protein) add up when stacked together.
At Chipotle: The flour tortilla (320 cal, 8g protein) is the single biggest calorie hit. Guacamole (230 cal, 2g protein) and the vinaigrette (220 cal, 1g protein) are close behind. Sour cream (110 cal), cheese (110 cal), and queso (120 cal) are moderate individually, but people tend to add two or three of them at once.
Chipotle has more total calorie traps because of the dairy section. CAVA's calorie traps are fewer but the dressings can do real damage if you pick the wrong one. For the full low-calorie playbook at each restaurant, see our lowest calorie CAVA bowl guide and lowest calorie Chipotle bowl guide.
The Free Topping Advantage: CAVA Wins by Volume
This is something the calorie comparisons don't capture on their own. CAVA has a deep bench of toppings that cost almost nothing calorically:
| CAVA Topping | Calories |
|---|---|
| Tomato + Cucumber | 5 |
| Salt-Brined Pickles | 5 |
| Shredded Romaine | 5 |
| Persian Cucumber | 15 |
| Tomato + Onion | 20 |
| Pickled Onions | 20 |
| Sumac Slaw | 30 |
| Fiery Broccoli | 35 |
You can stack five or six of these and add maybe 75 calories total while making the bowl feel much bigger and more interesting to eat. That matters when you're building a low-calorie bowl and don't want it to feel like a sad plate.
Chipotle's near-zero toppings are limited to fajita vegetables (20 cal) and romaine lettuce (5 cal). After that you're into salsas (15 to 80 cal) which add flavor but not volume or texture. Chipotle's topping variety is mostly salsas and dairy, not vegetables.
This is CAVA's real structural advantage for low-calorie builds. The protein goes to Chipotle, the base goes to CAVA if you pick lentils, but the toppings go to CAVA in a landslide.
Head-to-Head Builds
Here's where it gets practical. Same goal, best build at each restaurant.
Best Balanced Bowl (moderate calories, high protein)
CAVA: Balanced Bowl
Chipotle: Balanced Bowl
Nearly identical protein (46g vs 45g) and similar calories (550 vs 585). The difference is where the calories come from. CAVA's build is lower carb and higher fat. Chipotle's is higher carb and lower fat. Pick based on which split you prefer or which restaurant is closer.
Lowest Calorie Bowl
CAVA: Low-Cal Bowl
Chipotle: Low-Cal Bowl
Chipotle takes this one on raw numbers. 260 calories and 34g of protein versus CAVA's 275 calories and 30g. The gap comes down to Chipotle chicken being 180 cal for 32g of protein. Nothing at CAVA matches that ratio.
But the CAVA build has room to grow without growing the calorie count. Add pickled onions, fiery broccoli, and persian cucumber to that bowl and you're at maybe 345 calories with a much more satisfying plate. The Chipotle build is already maxed out on low-calorie toppings. Fajita veggies and romaine are the only near-zero options, and they're already in the build.
The Bottom Line
Neither restaurant is better across the board. Depends what you're after.
Pick CAVA if: You want lentils as a base (best protein-from-a-base option in fast casual), you prefer Mediterranean flavors, you want lighter dressing options, you want to load up on low-calorie vegetable toppings, or you're going lower carb and don't mind higher fat.
Pick Chipotle if: You want the leanest possible protein (chicken at 180 cal / 32g), you need double protein for high-protein goals, you want lower calorie rice, or you prefer to stack beans for fiber separately.
If you eat at both: That's probably the smartest move. Use CAVA for lentil-based bowls and Chipotle for chicken-heavy builds. They cover different gaps.
Build either order before you go: CAVA Macro Calculator | Chipotle Macro Calculator
All nutrition data from official published nutrition information for both restaurants. Values may vary by location.